I agree that they should be the "extremely obvious hyperlink" , it doesn't really make sense to me that there's these pages set up for each rank and yet the link you're most likely to see bypasses those pages.
I agree that they should be the "extremely obvious hyperlink" , it doesn't really make sense to me that there's these pages set up for each rank and yet the link you're most likely to see bypasses those pages.
Oh, don't get me wrong, the hyperlinks are essential as they provide a quick way to search each rank. I just think the icons should be... just icons, and a second hyperlink could be provided.
How active are the pages, anyway? I understand the Recognised page was last updated with a build in March or so, and the Bloodworks' page's featured build was posted in May. Didn't look at the other pages.
Oh, don't get me wrong, the hyperlinks are essential as they provide a quick way to search each rank. I just think the icons should be... just icons, and a second hyperlink could be provided.
How active are the pages, anyway? I understand the Recognised page was last updated with a build in March or so, and the Bloodworks' page's featured build was posted in May. Didn't look at the other pages.
Of course not. To be honest, I don't think anything could be done about that. I suppose I was just letting my mouth run.
I'd just always kind of looked at the deathmatches as sort of a way to garner attention (which, to be perfectly honest, I think it kind of fails at, because of the fading into recognised obscurity, plus reasons I detailed above). But their primary purpose is in cleaning house, which kind of takes the wind out of my sails, because it does indeed do a good job at that.
Perhaps if the deathmatch-featured builds took more responsibility for their quality, I'd think differently. But to me, if it's worth doing, it's worth doing right.
Of course not. To be honest, I don't think anything could be done about that. I suppose I was just letting my mouth run.
I'd just always kind of looked at the deathmatches as sort of a way to garner attention (which, to be perfectly honest, I think it kind of fails at, because of the fading into recognised obscurity, plus reasons I detailed above). But their primary purpose is in cleaning house, which kind of takes the wind out of my sails, because it does indeed do a good job at that.
Perhaps if the deathmatch-featured builds took more responsibility for their quality, I'd think differently. But to me, if it's worth doing, it's worth doing right.
Not that they're difficult to find - I looked, and I found the Bloodworks discussion in under two minutes. But that necessitated my knowing about the discussion at all. I... just took a second look and saw the sentence "click on one the emblems below to be taken to each rank's respective discussion page" (in bold and underlined, to boot!).
Perhaps it's my fault. Well, probably it's my fault.
Not that they're difficult to find - I looked, and I found the Bloodworks discussion in under two minutes. But that necessitated my knowing about the discussion at all. I... just took a second look and saw the sentence "click on one the emblems below to be taken to each rank's respective discussion page" (in bold and underlined, to boot!).
Perhaps it's my fault. Well, probably it's my fault.
I used to care about how many likes I got until I realised it was pointless. If just one person enjoys your build, then your build is a success.
This. People should post builds because they enjoy act of doing so. Posting a build solely to gain likes or be popular will inevitably set yourself up for disappointment when one of your builds doesn't go over as well as you'd like it to.
I used to care about how many likes I got until I realised it was pointless. If just one person enjoys your build, then your build is a success.
This. People should post builds because they enjoy act of doing so. Posting a build solely to gain likes or be popular will inevitably set yourself up for disappointment when one of your builds doesn't go over as well as you'd like it to.