Skyrim Character Building » Discussions


Discussion: Improving CB

  • May 1, 2018

    I get it Liss, I mean I'm definitely down for it and I'm planning it at some point. Looking back to a few weeks ago I really would've planned it for May if it weren't for the fact that April was so busy for me so I didn't think of it.

    Just in case you or anyone wants some info on why it hasn't been run yet. So Vargr was originally planning to run Modern Masters 2017 (I think...or was it 2016?) back in January and you can see where the problem with that was. It was around me just coming in and then Vargr leaving so we had just a confusing first month or so where I decided not to run it without Vargr at the time. I really would've preferred to run it back in January for numerous reasons, but it just wasn't entirely possible with the situation at the time.

    That said, I'm aiming at August, I think that'd be a solid period and then...if all goes well with my personal life, I aim at Modern Masters 2018 for January/February of 2019. That's where I'm leaning at the moment, because yeah, I do really want to run Modern Masters, though it'll probably be a bit different to the original one.

  • May 1, 2018
    That’s reassuring, Deebs. I potentially see it as a great retrospective on the past year in character building. A way to highlight trends and creativity. There was a good number of strong builds from 2017.
  • May 1, 2018
    Tysoyaha I feel you made a rather disingenuous statement when you claimed those worth a reputation for quality builds are coasting by on their reputation. If someone such as Lissette has such high name recognition it is only because they earn it and continue to prove they are worthy of such recognition. To raise people who haven’t earned that reputation to the same level as those who have is exactly the kind of thing that is slowly killing the group.
  • May 1, 2018

    Tysoyaha I feel you made a rather disingenuous statement when you claimed those worth a reputation for quality builds are coasting by on their reputation. If someone such as Lissette has such high name recognition it is only because they earn it and continue to prove they are worthy of such recognition. To raise people who haven’t earned that reputation to the same level as those who have is exactly the kind of thing that is slowly killing the group.

    So, you know I kinda agree to an extent but I think there's a key difference between coasting by on your reputation and living up to it. Someone like Liss puts in at least the same amount of effort with each build they put out (sometimes I'd even say she raises the bar with each build in some manner) but there have been members that sort of... created builds of the same level or got worse but would get more likes just because they were well known. 

    I mean, I've had a few multi-month periods where I've posted very mediocre content and was safe with a minimum of around 25-30 likes even though the quality wasn't anywhere near some of my other builds or what others were posting. I mean... If someone's posting high-level content that is legitimately better than what I put out, then it deserves more likes regardless of name recognition. I think that's more what Tysoyaha was aiming at. Not so much that recognition is bad inherently, but that in some cases it can cause problems when we're talking about putting people into a competition. 

  • May 1, 2018

    Fallout Boy said: Tysoyaha I feel you made a rather disingenuous statement when you claimed those worth a reputation for quality builds are coasting by on their reputation. If someone such as Lissette has such high name recognition it is only because they earn it and continue to prove they are worthy of such recognition. To raise people who haven’t earned that reputation to the same level as those who have is exactly the kind of thing that is slowly killing the group.

    Hmm...I was worried that someone would misunderstand that, I probably worded it strangely. What I meant was that I don't think we need competition to encourage higher quality builds because if you really think someone like Liz only puts in her maximum effort to win contests, then it's no longer very good motivation for her because she could coast on her reputation and win contests without much effort just because people are more likely to read her builds than some unknown newbie.

    Of coarse, the entire point of saying that if competition was all that encouraged quality then it wouldn't anymore because they could just rely on reputation now was because I don't believe it ever did. I think we can all tell that Liz puts maximum effort into all her builds, contest or not, because she has a passion for making interesting, thoughtful and high quality builds. Competition wouldn't affect the quality of her work because it's already always top notch.

    That being said, there people on here who have great reputations have them for two reasons: 1) they earned it through talent, hard work and dedication, and 2) they've had plenty of time and exposure to be able to put in that hard work and develop that reputation. A lot of new builders on here have plenty of talent and are willing to put in the work, but haven't yet gotten much time or exposure to develop a name for themselves.

    I don't think it invalidates the OG users hard work to say that those newbies deserve the chance to hone their craft and get their name out there. I'm not saying to coddle people and reward low effort builds...but how are new users going to progress and learn if their builds keep getting deleted because people are more likely to read, let alone vote for, a build with a better known name attached to it?

    Hell, it might be fun to have a blind contest or two for that very reason. Have a bunch of builds with no users name on them somehow and vote for the best one based on content alone. Frankly, the people with the best reps would likely still win because they've had the most practice, but it would ask be fun! Lol. Which is kind of my point, I definitely think we could use more competition but because it would be fun. The minute we start doing things because we think it'll enforce quality then it won't be fun anymore and people will lose the passion that makes them want to put effort into making quality content.

  • May 1, 2018

    Dragonborn1921 said:

    Tysoyaha I feel you made a rather disingenuous statement when you claimed those worth a reputation for quality builds are coasting by on their reputation. If someone such as Lissette has such high name recognition it is only because they earn it and continue to prove they are worthy of such recognition. To raise people who haven’t earned that reputation to the same level as those who have is exactly the kind of thing that is slowly killing the group.

    So, you know I kinda agree to an extent but I think there's a key difference between coasting by on your reputation and living up to it. Someone like Liss puts in at least the same amount of effort with each build they put out (sometimes I'd even say she raises the bar with each build in some manner) but there have been members that sort of... created builds of the same level or got worse but would get more likes just because they were well known. 

    I mean, I've had a few multi-month periods where I've posted very mediocre content and was safe with a minimum of around 25-30 likes even though the quality wasn't anywhere near some of my other builds or what others were posting. I mean... If someone's posting high-level content that is legitimately better than what I put out, then it deserves more likes regardless of name recognition. I think that's more what Tysoyaha was aiming at. Not so much that recognition is bad inherently, but that in some cases it can cause problems when we're talking about putting people into a competition. 

     

     

    Deebs is being humble, but this is still close to what I meant. I'm familiar with his work, and none of it is even close to mediocre, he just thinks they're mediocre because he's got such high standards for himself. However, even though I truly believe that nearly everyone who reads his content likes it and did so because it deserves to be liked...for him that's 25-30 likes because when people see his name, they click link and read the build. Meanwhile, Joethenewguy can post something that's also worthy of getting likes from nearly everyone who reads it but only get three likes because that's how many people read his content.

    So with that in mind, a Deebs vs Joethenewguy contest would be really fun for Joe because having DBs name attached to it will probably get Joethenewguy the most exposure he's ever gotten! Sure, DB will probably win because he's had practice making great builds and honestly his is just going to be a higher level...but what's the point of getting Joe all that exposure and the good advice that comes with it if his build gets deleted immediately!? I'm just saying that I'd be stoked to lose to Deebs or Liz in a contest because, while their build would for sure kick my builds ass, those 30 people who voted for Deebs still read my build too for once! Lol. A few probably liked it and gave me some constructive criticism or nice comments too! So I'd really only be upset if it meant my build got deleted.

  • May 1, 2018
    All this talk of new guys having little chance of overcoming a veteran builders reputation... Have you even considered that maybe “JoeNewGuy” might surprise you and win? You won’t know unless you give the new guys a chance to compete on equal foooting with the “pros”, no training wheels, no handicaps, no blind contests, just their skills against the vets.
  • Member
    May 1, 2018
    It's happened before
  • May 1, 2018
    Everyone has been Joe or Joanthenewgal once. Lordy, I really don’t even consider myself a veteran builder. Too sporadic with my output.
  • May 1, 2018

    Fallout Boy said: All this talk of new guys having little chance of overcoming a veteran builders reputation... Have you even considered that maybe “JoeNewGuy” might surprise you and win? You won’t know unless you give the new guys a chance to compete on equal foooting with the “pros”, no training wheels, no handicaps, no blind contests, just their skills against the vets.

    I agree. I just don't think not deleting the losing build can really be considered a "handicap". Also a blind contest would be equal footing, it would be removing a handicap. That's why I suggested it. Really predicting who wins wasn't my point, my point was that, win or lose, it should be fun and encourage new users to get more involved. Maybe Joe would win, but if he does then having one of his many many builds deleted wouldn't be all that devastating for DB. On the other hand, having his first attempt at a build thrown away could discourage Joe from continuing to make content. Frankly, we probably aren't hurting for space like we were back when Bloodworks builds meant less than 500 likes. Lol. Our focus now should be on bolstering activity and encouraging new content, not deleting it. Again, I'm strongly behind competition, I'm just against deathmatch. It no longer serves the same function and would be counter intuitive both for the users and the site itself. DB might win, or Joe might win...but either way deleting anything over the results would do more harm than good in our, now, much smaller community.