Skyrim Character Building » Discussions

Character Building Events

• Deleted Member

  
   

  June 4, 2014

  Also, when you actually get into the lore of the holds and cities (like from other games or books), it gets very interesting and can offer a fair bit of depth as more than Winterhold=wizard, Riften=thief.

  Also, when you actually get into the lore of the holds and cities (like from other games or books), it gets very interesting and can offer a fair bit of depth as more than Winterhold=wizard, Riften=thief.

• Vazgen

  

  Member
   

  June 4, 2014

  Specific item is one thing, but I'm talking about basing a build over it. Like Henson's Forgotten and Aetherial Shield 

  Specific item is one thing, but I'm talking about basing a build over it. Like Henson's Forgotten and Aetherial Shield 

• Toxic Reaper

  

  Member
   

  June 4, 2014

  Dibs on dawnstar if this happens. lol

  Dibs on dawnstar if this happens. lol

• Alastor

  

  Member
   

  June 5, 2014

  Does anyone else think that our Event Builds deserve to be ranked? When muggles (non-members) come to check out our builds, they go straight for the Legendary and Mythic ranks because it's the best we have to offer. Why wouldn't event builds get thrown in with the rest? That's another reason I didn't like the "Event Build" prefix, it doesn't make sense to those who aren't familiar with our Events and nobody wants to see Event Builds and Character Builds all mixed together. The Event Tag should have been enough IMO. Thoughts? Opinions?

  Does anyone else think that our Event Builds deserve to be ranked? When muggles (non-members) come to check out our builds, they go straight for the Legendary and Mythic ranks because it's the best we have to offer. Why wouldn't event builds get thrown in with the rest? That's another reason I didn't like the "Event Build" prefix, it doesn't make sense to those who aren't familiar with our Events and nobody wants to see Event Builds and Character Builds all mixed together. The Event Tag should have been enough IMO. Thoughts? Opinions?
• Spectre

  
   

  June 5, 2014

  Especially seeing how the majority of Winterhold is anti-magic. To add on to this idea, you just have to receive the quests in the hold, you should be allowed to leave the hold to complete them.

  Especially seeing how the majority of Winterhold is anti-magic. To add on to this idea, you just have to receive the quests in the hold, you should be allowed to leave the hold to complete them.
• Curse Never Dying

  

  Member
   

  June 6, 2014

  I agree with this. I think event builds should be ranked. Ranking them would give them much deserved attention.

  I agree with this. I think event builds should be ranked. Ranking them would give them much deserved attention.
• Albino

  

  Member
   

  June 6, 2014

  I agree as well. No reason why they can't have an ordinary rank tag as well.

  I agree as well. No reason why they can't have an ordinary rank tag as well.

• Alastor

  

  Member
   

  June 6, 2014

  Definitely. I don't know anyone who is going through the events to see how they turned out. I participated in both and I haven't been back since! The only way our epic event builds will receive proper recognition is by ranking them. This doesn't have to be immediate and I know Mason fought against it but I suggest ranking them and changing the prefix back. We could take a vote or wait til Mason gets back but I think it'd be a good idea :) Does anyone remember why he didn't want to rank them to begin with? I feel like it had to do with the prefix change.

  Definitely. I don't know anyone who is going through the events to see how they turned out. I participated in both and I haven't been back since! The only way our epic event builds will receive proper recognition is by ranking them. This doesn't have to be immediate and I know Mason fought against it but I suggest ranking them and changing the prefix back. We could take a vote or wait til Mason gets back but I think it'd be a good idea :) Does anyone remember why he didn't want to rank them to begin with? I feel like it had to do with the prefix change.
• Tae-Rai

  

  Member
   

  June 6, 2014

  I disagree with this idea. At a glance, it makes it easier to tell normal builds from the event. The tags keep the entries separate and they are not ranked because they are special event builds that ate already getting much attention then the normal builds. Not sure what Billy thinks of this, but I am against changing it back.

  I disagree with this idea. At a glance, it makes it easier to tell normal builds from the event. The tags keep the entries separate and they are not ranked because they are special event builds that ate already getting much attention then the normal builds. Not sure what Billy thinks of this, but I am against changing it back.
• Tae-Rai

  

  Member
   

  June 6, 2014

  It is a seperate tag already.

  It is a seperate tag already.