The Gateway » Discussions


Site Feedback Thread

  • Leader
    April 27, 2016

    Hey there Vault Members! In an effort to centralize these topics, and due to some technical difficulties with the old thread, we're moving the Site Feedback Thread into The Gateway.

    If you have any feedback for the site generally, please feel free to leave those comments here. Please note that ideas for things we should cover in The Gateway specifically should be directed to the Group Suggestion Box

    We'll read every comment here, but please keep in mind that we can't fulfill every request. 

  • Member
    May 6, 2016

    So, I know this isn´t feedback, but since the drop down still says help, unless that thread is gone, I got a question. How do we add music to our pages? HTML?

  • Member
    May 9, 2016
    I have a idea about potentially overhauling the Classics group into a generel TES group that can cover non skyrim or ESO TES games whether they are classic or not. Such as Legends for for example.
  • Member
    May 9, 2016

    To quote what I said over at the Classics group, here's my thoughts on it:

    I actually quite like the idea Dragonborn came up with over at the Gateway, about making an entirely new group especially for the Spin-offs, both TES and Fallout.

    Looking at the Classics discussions, there's not a one related to any of the Spin-offs, so removing them from Classics wouldn't harm the group in any way, not to mention that Fallout could also benefit from a "Spin-offs" group, with Fallout Shelter.

  • Member
    May 9, 2016

    I agree. Been meaning to play the spinoffs for awhile now

  • Member
    May 9, 2016

    The problem with a standalone group is interest. Only a small minority of people expressed interest in Elder Scrolls Legends (let alone any desire to make content for it) during the recent poll, while Elder Scrolls Online has been struggling to gain any traction on the site. As for Fallout, there's no way we can expect people to want to make content for a Fallout Shelter group when we can barely get them involved with Fallout 4. Expanding Classics into a general TES group might work, but a dedicated spinoffs group would be dead from the start.

  • Member
    May 10, 2016
    Along with the fact that classics already covers most of the spinoffs already with the exception of ESO and Legends it would make sense for it to throw in legends and have it become a Generel TES group or TES Miscellaneous.
  • May 10, 2016

    Gotta agree with Albino here guys. We've got like, what, three-four content creators for a mainstream Fallout game right now? I can see a group for Legends and Fallout Shelter getting about three discussions and then dying. I would feel especially bad for whoever the poor guy that had to host that was. I say we expand Classics to include Legends but not Fallout Shelter. Trying to force in content that just won't fit is worthless, IMO.

  • Member
    May 10, 2016

    Eh, that is true. Can we at least try to come up with a different name, though? TES General, or TES Miscellaneous just sounds a bit too cobbled together compared to something like Classics.

  • Member
    May 10, 2016

    Aren´t the spinoff Classics too? I keep seeing people complaining about no content for spinoffs. As far as I remember, no one is stopping you.

    Classics means it´s for any TES game that came out before Skyrim, which are...basicaly all of them. And renaming it to TES General only because you add Card Game there...Well...whatever.