Elder Scrolls Lore » Discussions


A Metaphorical View of Dragons

  • Member
    November 11, 2016

    This post is the product of some internal musings. Actually, I feel like Septimus Signus. :D Be warned: what follows is the ravings of a man who has been plague with insomnia over the last few days. Feel free to ignore, engage, correct, or call me an idiot. lol

    I often wonder if the dragons themselves are metaphors of a great truth concerning the flow time itself. But, before I get to my premise, I have to lay a context.
     
     
     
    FIRST, let's talk about Akatosh (or Auriel, but I personally believe there are some differences). Akatosh is known as the Dragon God of Time. Why? Well, we all know that the avatar of Akatosh is a dragon. This is seen in most installments of the TES franchise. In fact, the Prophet in ESO uses the invocation, "Akatosh, Dragon God of Time," to gain assistance in escaping Coldharbour. So that's the Dragon part. As for his connection to time, the Monomyth provide some insight:
    At first the Aurbis was turbulent and confusing, as Anuiel's ruminations went on without design. Aspects of the Aurbis then asked for a schedule to follow or procedures whereby they might enjoy themselves a little longer outside of perfect knowledge. So that he might know himself this way, too, Anu created Auriel, the soul of his soul. Auriel bled through the Aurbis as a new force, called time. With time, various aspects of the Aurbis began to understand their natures and limitations. 
    This passage explains that Auriel (or Akatosh) "spun off" from Anuiel for the express purpose of invoking time, which was originally intended to provide structure and order out of the seemingly chaotic nature of the Aurbis (universe). So that's the Time part of the equation. Akatosh is the Dragon (avatar) God of Time (purpose).
     
     
    SECOND, we should talk about Dragon Breaks. I know this is everyone's favorite subject. Yeah right! Although they are difficult to understand (due to their very nature), Dragon Breaks are a recorded part of TES lore. So what is a Dragon Break? From the UESP:
    A Dragon Break is a phenomenon where linear time is broken, and becomes non-linear. The "Dragon" refers to Akatosh, the Dragon God of Time. A Dragon Break not only precedes significant changes in Tamriel, but challenges mortal comprehension. It is a re-alignment of time and space in response to an event which makes the normal continuity of reality impossible. The chaos which ensues is a refrain of the chaos of the Dawn Era. The area that is noticeably affected, and length of the interval measured in the areas not apparently affected, varies with each Dragon Break. Historically, the cause is often attributed to mortals manipulating divine matters.
    Essentially, a Dragon Break is a literal "breaking" of the timeline. Alternate timelines--the outcomes of any and every possible choice--occur simultaneously. Confused? Good, you should be. Since Akatosh is the Dragon God of Time, whose sole purpose is to provide ... you guessed it ... time (order and structure) to the Aurbis (universe), a Dragon Break is a breaking of Akatosh himself. Instead of an orderly timeline, we get the disorderly competition of mutiple timelines, all vying for dominance. I like to think of it as Akatosh suffering from Disassociative Identity Disorder (split personalties) Once someone or something administers his meds (an event that brings the Dragon Break to an end), Akatosh is back to one personality and the timeline is restored, fixed, or whatever (we can't really know if the original timeline is restored or if an alternate timeline takes over).
     
     
    THIRD, let's talk about dragons. From Paarthurnax's dialog and Shalidor's Insights, we learn that the dragons existed from the beginning of time as children of Akatosh. We should take the word "children" very losely, however. If you remember, the original spirits (Auriel included) are not "born" in the conventional sense, but rather "spun off" from the principal spirit. In the case of dragons, it might be more proper to say that dragons "spun off" from Akatosh/Auriel himself. As Akatosh, and the other original spirits, are various expressions of Anuiel, so the dragons are the various expressions of Akatosh. Chief of these expressions is Alduin. Paarthurnax and Shalidor's Insights again teach us is that Alduin is the "Firstborn of Akatosh" and the creator of dragon civilization. 
     
     
    Okay, okay, I'll get to the point. Thanks for hanging in with me so far. Here's the point: Is is possible that the dragons are the metaphorical represention of the multiple streams of time? Remember, dragons are the various expressions of Akatosh, who is the Dragon God of Time. If "Time" were to create various expressions of itself, wouldn't those expressions represent alternate possibilities or realities--what time would look like if different choices were made or different situations were present? 
     
    Take it a step further. What is the nature of dragons? Paarthurnax teaches us that the innate nature of dragons is to dominate and control. Metaphorically speaking, then, each alternate expression of time is vying to dominate and control--to be the true reality, or the currently operating timeline. Dragons are also prideful and melancholy. Again metaphorically, each alternate timeline considers itself superior to any other timelline and is melancholy or sad that it is not the dominate timeline.
     
    Alduin presents an interesting metaphor. With all these alternative timelines vying for dominance, the universe would revert to utter chaos. Indeed, a Dragon Break is chaotic. R'leyt-harhr, the Khajiit in Where Were You When the Dragon Broke, writes, "The second time [the second Dragon Break] was in Daggerfall, or was it Sentinel, or was it Wayrest, or was it in all three places at once? Get me, Cyrodiil?" There is no order to time whatsoever in a Dragon Break. Okay, back to Alduin. Since Alduin "created dragon civilization" (i.e., brought order the domineering and competing nature of dragons), I believe that he metaphorically represents Akatosh's need to bring order (Akatosh's purpose) to the timeline--to prevent what we see happening in a Dragon Break. However, Alduin doesn't really bring order. On the contrary, he is called the World Eater who must be stopped by the Dovakiin. Contrary to his purpose, Alduin rallies the various dragons to bring chaos upon the world. 
     
    Putting all this together, the recurring Nordic story of dragons seems to be a metaphor for the constant threat of a Dragon Break, the inevitable state of being if Akatosh fails to fulfill his purpose in the universe. If Akatosh loses his mind, reality comes crashing in. Metaphorically, then, Alduin is meant to be the stop-gap, keeping reality in check. However, instead of fulfilling his purpose, he brings chaos to the world by rallying the various possibilities of time against the orderly world. The Dovakiin, then, was given a unique power to stop Alduin and to absorb the souls, the essence, of the alternative realities from asserting its dominance over the Aurbis.
     
    Epilogue: Why all this obesession with metaphors?
     
    Well, this would take too long to explain. Needless to say that if you've studied TES lore, you'd know that everything is based on story and metaphor. Out of the words of the venerable Urag gro-Shub, "[An elder scroll is] a reflection of all possible futures and all possible pasts. Each reader sees different reflections through different lenses, and may come away with a very different reading. But at the same time, all of it is true. Even the falsehoods. Especially the falsehoods."
     
    See, told you I mantled Septimus Signus....
  • November 11, 2016

    This. BE. Good! :D

    Interesting point of view, Patriarch. So if I´m getting it right, do you think that every subsequent Dragon Break creates a new dragon? 

    And Alduin is actually an interesting thing. In Nordic Lore there is no Auriel, no Akatosh, their chief deity is Shor and so they must have someone to be on the wrong side of the neighborhood. Thus Alduin. Which is kind of interesting. Other races have this God of Time, but the question is...why Nords have a God of the End of Time? Because that´s what in my opinion Alduin is. If Akatosh is Time, Alduin is the End of Time. 

    But that raises even more questions I think. If Alduin is Akatosh, why he doesn´t seem like a God? And how is it that Akatosh is trying to stop Alduin who is Akatosh? It´s not like you got Auriel kicking Akatosh´s arse right? 

    But maybe it is as you say. Alduin is just an offspring. Alternate timeline, maybe a timeline where Dragons rule? Where the world has ended? 

    Interesting topic, Pat. :)

     

  • Member
    November 11, 2016

    Thanks, Karver!

    I'm not sure I thought through whether a dragon break actually creates another dragon. Interesting thing to ponder.

    I love your point about the ancient Nord pantheon's lack of an Akatosh figure.  First, let me say that I don't think Alduin is a god, in the classic sense, any more than we can call Paarthurnax a god. Back to the point, I'm not sure if the Nords have a concept of time, at least like the elven races. Other than believing that Kyne "breathed out" the race on the Throat of the World (which sounds suspiciously like how the original spirits "spun off" from Anuiel), do they speak about time? I couldn't find anything concrete. If you think about it, this makes sense. Nords didn't have a written language until Ysgramor. Ysgramor is credited as the first Nord to develop a method of transcribing knowledge via runes, which occured not long after his arrival in Skyrim. Remember, Ysgramor came from Atmora where the Nords finally settled. OOG sources indicate that Atmora is not only literally frozen, but also frozen in time. Therefore, if true, ancient Nords would not have much of a conception of time at all. Although I am sure that time exists in Atmora in some fashion, Nords don't seem to obsess over it. Therefore, an Akatosh character wouldn't be much use to them.

    Further, Nords call Alduin the World Eater brings the end of the world, not the end of time.  That's an important distinction. As mentioned, ancient Nords may not have much a conception of time (at least like the elves).  But, regardless of whether they have a conception of time, the fact remains that Auriel/Akatosh was created to bring order to the universe, which we know as time. Dragons are the spun-off alternate expressions of time. Alduin rallies these alternate expressions of time to bring the end. Because the Nord may not have a robust conception of time, the ancient Nord believes that Alduin brings the end of the world when in actuality, he's bringing the end of time. 

    So in that regard, I do not think that Alduin was an alternate timeline. I just think he was "spun off" from Akatosh to bring order to the competitive nature of the alternate timelines which would naturally "spin off" from Akatosh.

    The more I type, the less sense this makes. :D 

     

  • November 11, 2016

    Patriarch said:

    I love your point about the ancient Nord pantheon's lack of an Akatosh figure.  

    Well, that´s the thing. It´s not anceint Nord pantheon. It is quite recent pantheon. 3E. Varieties of Faith: The Nords

    Good point about end of the world. Varieties of Faith says that Alduin destroyed the previous world or kalpa so that the new one could begin. Now think about Parthy´s dialogue, about kalpa and all that. Does Kalpa just mean world? Or Time-World? Timeline? Period of time?

    I hate to quote UESP here, because I don´t really know how reliable it is in this case but...

    kalpa is an epoch of time comprised of the birth, life and death of that specific period.[1] For example, the Dawn Era and its chaos was the end of a previous kalpa, and the beginning of another.

    And here is direct quote from Kirkbride:

    Assume "The Dawn Era was the End of the Previous Kalpa. The new Kalpa begins with the first day of the Merethic Era."

    Then put on your lore-hats and start looking hard at the ramifications of that.

    It is implied that Alduin might destroyed the kalpa that was Dawn Era. So what he ended there? Did he ended time and Akatosh started it anew?

    We could probably polemize about the meaning "end of the world" and "end of the time", but what do the Nords call Alduin in Skyrim? Bringer of Endtimes or something like that? 

    But I´m talking about what Nords believe in, not what really Alduin is, and that is difference. Though I wouldn´t completely disregard the fact that in TES what people believe in can become reality. 

    And I think we got little bit off the track here... :D

     

  • Member
    November 11, 2016

    All very good points, Karver. Like Septimus, I'll have to retreat to my ice cave and ruminate further. lol

  • November 11, 2016

    Patriarch said:

    All very good points, Karver. Like Septimus, I'll have to retreat to my ice cave and ruminate further. lol

    Just don´t go around collecting souls and opening the Box! You know where that got ol´poor Septimus. :D

    The point here is...truth is subjective. I think you are onto something here, definitely, because I always wondered what exactly dragons are, and I do like this theory. Just looking for an angle, you know. :)

  • Member
    November 12, 2016

    Lots of interesting things here Patriarch! Almost too many :D Timey-whimey after a long shift isn't good for the thought organ :P

    Okay, okay, I'll get to the point. Thanks for hanging in with me so far. Here's the point: Is is possible that the dragons are the metaphorical represention of the multiple streams of time? Remember, dragons are the various expressions of Akatosh, who is the Dragon God of Time. If "Time" were to create various expressions of itself, wouldn't those expressions represent alternate possibilities or realities--what time would look like if different choices were made or different situations were present?

    About that, have you seen Kurt Kuhlmann's and Michael Kirkbride's concept of dragons?

    K&K's shorthand for dragons very early on were 'biological time machines powered by ideologies'.

    Factor that in and I'd say you are hitting pretty close to the bullseye.

    On this:

    I like to think of it as Akatosh suffering from Disassociative Identity Disorder (split personalties) Once someone or something administers his meds (an event that brings the Dragon Break to an end), Akatosh is back to one personality and the timeline is restored, fixed, or whatever (we can't really know if the original timeline is restored or if an alternate timeline takes over).

    You've read Eat the Dreamer?

    The Aedroth Aka, who goes by so many names as to perhaps already suggest what I'm about to commit to memospore, is completely insane. His mind broke when his "perch from Eternity allowed the day" and we of all the Aurbis live on through its fragments, ensnared in the temporal writings and erasures of the acausal whim that he begat by saying "I AM". In the aetheric thunder of self-applause that followed (nay, rippled until convention, that is, amnesia), is it any wonder that the Time God would hate the same-twin on the other end of the aurbrilical cord, the Space God? That any Creation would become so utterly dangerous because of that singular fear of a singular word's addition: "I AM NOT"?

    That all the Interplay is one flea of assertion on a wolf of naught, and that every experience (that is, everything) born from that primal wail would cascade unto the echo-need of hologram, each slice the same except for scale, and all the magic that would need to spring forth just to hold it together at living, divine cross-purpose, support struts made from the need to exist (axial, along its two-headed fighting rays, each refusing their origin point, that is, Tower), terrestons versus chronocules, and in the end (an end that ever refuses to hold) it all becomes a lobotomized (for what is not lobal if not the dracochoreography made flesh?), reptilian (coiled), and massive map-god (holding a compass, holding a timepiece), drooling (the water from which we dragged ourselves out of to say, mirror-like, autochthonic, automatic, "WE ARE, TOO") on his countless knees, dementia given dimension, dimension dementia...

    So what we have is, in essence, a metaphor for the big bang as you pretty much summarise, which is where my obsession with the-gods-and-demons-are-just-Aka's-personalty-fragments schtick comes from :D

    we learn that the dragons existed from the beginning of time as children of Akatosh. We should take the word "children" very losely, however. If you remember, the original spirits (Auriel included) are not "born" in the conventional sense, but rather "spun off" from the principal spirit. In the case of dragons, it might be more proper to say that dragons "spun off" from Akatosh/Auriel himself. As Akatosh, and the other original spirits, are various expressions of Anuiel, so the dragons are the various expressions of Akatosh.

    So to take this one stage further, if the metaphores and stories told by the various cultures become true ('coz this is Tamiel), how does the idea that these metaphore-dragons play out? I mean, the story is a cycle for the Nords, much like Ragnarok. Alduin will eat the world and the world will be reborn... rinse and repeat. Could these metaphor-dragons ever get their day, or is Alduin fated to forever do this?

    To take that thought further, we have seen the quantum nature of the aurbis fairly often. Is a Dragon Break a new reality in a quantum suicide way?

    Metaphorically, then, Alduin is meant to be the stop-gap, keeping reality in check. However, instead of fulfilling his purpose, he brings chaos to the world by rallying the various possibilities of time against the orderly world. The Dovakiin, then, was given a unique power to stop Alduin and to absorb the souls, the essence, of the alternative realities from asserting its dominance over the Aurbis.

    Ok, I love this interpretation of Alduin rallying the the other shards of time. To make things more complicated in regards to the Dovahkiin and an opportunity to quote the Pelin-El, what does it mean for both Aka and Lorkhan if their shared spirit is "eating" all these shards of time?

    "O Aka, for our shared madness I do this! I watch you watching me watching back"

  • Tom
    Member
    November 12, 2016

    I agree with your first two points, but I'm going to add my own commentary on a few things. Overall this was a nice read.

    Patriarch said:

    THIRD, let's talk about dragons. From Paarthurnax's dialog and Shalidor's Insights, we learn that the dragons existed from the beginning of time as children of Akatosh. We should take the word "children" very losely, however. If you remember, the original spirits (Auriel included) are not "born" in the conventional sense, but rather "spun off" from the principal spirit. In the case of dragons, it might be more proper to say that dragons "spun off" from Akatosh/Auriel himself. As Akatosh, and the other original spirits, are various expressions of Anuiel, so the dragons are the various expressions of Akatosh. Chief of these expressions is Alduin. Paarthurnax and Shalidor's Insights again teach us is that Alduin is the "Firstborn of Akatosh" and the creator of dragon civilization. 
     
     
     
    I have two disagreements here, one with vocabulary and another with chicken and the egg.
     
    First, I think "spun off" isn't accurate. Fractured is the better word. Dragons are fractions of the Aka oversoul, just as Aka is a fraction of the Godhead. Subradiency is made by division from the Godhead. Kirkbride has also described "families" of Aedra and Daedra to be idealogical, not literal. Dragons being the children of Akatosh I read as being fractions of the Time God and associates in ideaology.
     
    Second, and this is entirely my personal view, I think Alduin is older than Akatosh. By which I mean the concept of Alduin predates Akatosh, at least for the Nords.
     
     
    Okay, okay, I'll get to the point. Thanks for hanging in with me so far. Here's the point: Is is possible that the dragons are the metaphorical represention of the multiple streams of time? Remember, dragons are the various expressions of Akatosh, who is the Dragon God of Time. If "Time" were to create various expressions of itself, wouldn't those expressions represent alternate possibilities or realities--what time would look like if different choices were made or different situations were present?
     
    Take it a step further. What is the nature of dragons? Paarthurnax teaches us that the innate nature of dragons is to dominate and control. Metaphorically speaking, then, each alternate expression of time is vying to dominate and control--to be the true reality, or the currently operating timeline. Dragons are also prideful and melancholy. Again metaphorically, each alternate timeline considers itself superior to any other timelline and is melancholy or sad that it is not the dominate timeline.
     
     
    Except there are no new dragons. They've just always been and their numbers have never grown. If they represented new timelines created by dragon breaks, we'd get more with each. I really can't help but see dragons as lesser Aedra akin to Dremora Lords. But I do agree wholeheatdily that the nature of dragons is a reflection of Time. By definition it asserts dominion and control over everything that happens keeping everything from happening at once. It's word is made law by this control.
     
     
    Alduin presents an interesting metaphor. With all these alternative timelines vying for dominance, the universe would revert to utter chaos. Indeed, a Dragon Break is chaotic. R'leyt-harhr, the Khajiit in Where Were You When the Dragon Broke, writes, "The second time [the second Dragon Break] was in Daggerfall, or was it Sentinel, or was it Wayrest, or was it in all three places at once? Get me, Cyrodiil?" There is no order to time whatsoever in a Dragon Break. Okay, back to Alduin. Since Alduin "created dragon civilization" (i.e., brought order the domineering and competing nature of dragons), I believe that he metaphorically represents Akatosh's need to bring order (Akatosh's purpose) to the timeline--to prevent what we see happening in a Dragon Break. However, Alduin doesn't really bring order. On the contrary, he is called the World Eater who must be stopped by the Dovakiin. Contrary to his purpose, Alduin rallies the various dragons to bring chaos upon the world. 
     
    Putting all this together, the recurring Nordic story of dragons seems to be a metaphor for the constant threat of a Dragon Break, the inevitable state of being if Akatosh fails to fulfill his purpose in the universe. If Akatosh loses his mind, reality comes crashing in. Metaphorically, then, Alduin is meant to be the stop-gap, keeping reality in check. However, instead of fulfilling his purpose, he brings chaos to the world by rallying the various possibilities of time against the orderly world. The Dovakiin, then, was given a unique power to stop Alduin and to absorb the souls, the essence, of the alternative realities from asserting its dominance over the Aurbis.
     
     
    I disagree with Dragons bringing disorder, and Alduin specifically. Destorying the world does not mean Chaos. Death does not mean Chaos. It is Alduin's purpose to bring Time to an End each Kalpa. (I reread this and found issue with myself. Death and End Times is CHANGE, which I think is the more appropriate term to use here instead of Chaos.) THe entire narrative of the Nords is to thwart the forces of Stasis that stood in opposition to Shor. Atmora is frozen in time and Nords change their minds ten times a minute to prevent them from freezing too.
     
    The Dragonborn, while having the soul of a dragon, is the antithesis of a dragon. That's why Alduin is the evil god and worship of Akatosh is seen as foolish while they adore Talos. Nirn has a purpose, and it will keep getting reset and playing all over again until Lorkhan or Auri'El wins and creates a new Amaranth or undoes Nirn respectively. Alduin is the reset button. That's why the Nords hate Alduin, he keeps fucking up Shor's plans whether they know that's the reason or not. I don't think you need any more reason than not wanting the world to end myself. Paarthurnax acknowledges this in conversation, saying something along the lines of "the next world will have to take care of itself".
     
    Which brings me back around to the chicken and time egg and why I think Alduin predates Akatosh. That damn Simian, as previously mentioned, exorcised all the elf qualities of Auri'El, and stuffed back in Mannish ones, transforming the Elven God-King whose symbol was an Eagle with the Padomaic attitudes of Lorkhan that Men follow. That's why he's a Dragon, the Snake of Padomay and Eagle of Auri'El. But you mess with time and things get funky, retroactively making Akatosh the prime time deity.
     
    But! Nords already had a concept of Alduin, and they hated him. The Dragon Wars already happened centuries before the Alessians. The Alessians took the Nordic gods and blended them with Elven and Nedic ones to get the Imperial Divines.
     
    Alduin predates Akatosh, in a way, but Akatosh asserts itself over Alduin by nature, blurring the lines because of the nature of Time. Aka is all of these deities in one, which is why he's Aka; Also Known As.

     

  • Member
    November 14, 2016

    @Tom

    All very good points. First, I need to make sure that my intention for this post is clear. I am in no way asserting fact or truth on the matter (if there is such a thing in TES). I am FAR from being a lore master. On the contrary, I am a mere novice with ideas floating around in my nugget. Although I believe head canon is perfectly valid, this post is designed to help me form a more cogent idea about dragons as I see them as far more than mere reptiles with a penchant for domination and a touch of moodiness. Clearly, we all seem to be in agreement that Akatosh is off his rocker. 

    Second, my replies are thusly:

    Tom said:

    I have two disagreements here, one with vocabulary and another with chicken and the egg.

     
    First, I think "spun off" isn't accurate. Fractured is the better word. Dragons are fractions of the Aka oversoul, just as Aka is a fraction of the Godhead. Subradiency is made by division from the Godhead. Kirkbride has also described "families" of Aedra and Daedra to be idealogical, not literal. Dragons being the children of Akatosh I read as being fractions of the Time God and associates in ideaology.

    Agreed. I placed "spun off" in quotation marks because I lacked a better term at thetime of writing. You and Phil articulated it far better by using the terms "fracture" and "shatter." 

    Tom said:

    Except there are no new dragons. They've just always been and their numbers have never grown. If they represented new timelines created by dragon breaks, we'd get more with each. 

     

    I reread my post to make sure I was not implying that new dragons are formed/shattered (whatever they are) at a Dragon Break--because I wasn't. In the comments, Karver brought it up, so maybe I was not as clear as I should have been. 

    Tom said:

    The Dragonborn, while having the soul of a dragon, is the antithesis of a dragon. That's why Alduin is the evil god and worship of Akatosh is seen as foolish while they adore Talos. Nirn has a purpose, and it will keep getting reset and playing all over again until Lorkhan or Auri'El wins and creates a new Amaranth or undoes Nirn respectively. Alduin is the reset button. That's why the Nords hate Alduin, he keeps fucking up Shor's plans whether they know that's the reason or not. I don't think you need any more reason than not wanting the world to end myself. Paarthurnax acknowledges this in conversation, saying something along the lines of "the next world will have to take care of itself".

     
    Which brings me back around to the chicken and time egg and why I think Alduin predates Akatosh. That damn Simian, as previously mentioned, exorcised all the elf qualities of Auri'El, and stuffed back in Mannish ones, transforming the Elven God-King whose symbol was an Eagle with the Padomaic attitudes of Lorkhan that Men follow. That's why he's a Dragon, the Snake of Padomay and Eagle of Auri'El. But you mess with time and things get funky, retroactively making Akatosh the prime time deity.
     
    But! Nords already had a concept of Alduin, and they hated him. The Dragon Wars already happened centuries before the Alessians. The Alessians took the Nordic gods and blended them with Elven and Nedic ones to get the Imperial Divines.
     
    Alduin predates Akatosh, in a way, but Akatosh asserts itself over Alduin by nature, blurring the lines because of the nature of Time. Aka is all of these deities in one, which is why he's Aka; Also Known As.

     

    Okay, I have a question. I understand and agree with the concept of the ongoing struggle between Lorkhan/Shor and Auri'El. However, I hope I understand your point about Alduin correctly.  You said, [Alduin] keeps fucking up Shor's plans whether they know that's the reason or not. I understood this to mean that Alduin is Auri'El's reset button (my logic is that he's fucking up Shor, so he could not be from Shor).  If, then, Alduin is Auri'El's "reset" button, does Alduin's appearance mean that Lorkhan/Shor is winning; thus, the need for Auri'El to reset the fight? If true, how does that square with current events where it appears that Lorkhan/Shor is not winning, i.e., removal of Man's dominance (the decline of the Empire), the removal of Talos worship, the rise of Elven dominance, etc.?

     

  • Tom
    Member
    November 15, 2016

    @Tom

    All very good points. First, I need to make sure that my intention for this post is clear. I am in no way asserting fact or truth on the matter (if there is such a thing in TES). I am FAR from being a lore master. On the contrary, I am a mere novice with ideas floating around in my nugget. Although I believe head canon is perfectly valid, this post is designed to help me form a more cogent idea about dragons as I see them as far more than mere reptiles with a penchant for domination and a touch of moodiness. Clearly, we all seem to be in agreement that Akatosh is off his rocker. 

     

    I by no means wish to discourage anyone, and only offer up my own ideas for argument. By picking apart each other's ideas we can improve or make new ones, I think. Really, this is the stuff that I find the most enjoyable in this group; arguing lore ideas.

    But yes, most everyone does agree Akatosh is off his rocker. xD

     

     

    I reread my post to make sure I was not implying that new dragons are formed/shattered (whatever they are) at a Dragon Break--because I wasn't. In the comments, Karver brought it up, so maybe I was not as clear as I should have been. 

     

    I think it was this paragraph,

    "Okay, okay, I'll get to the point. Thanks for hanging in with me so far. Here's the point: Is is possible that the dragons are the metaphorical represention of the multiple streams of time? Remember, dragons are the various expressions of Akatosh, who is the Dragon God of Time. If "Time" were to create various expressions of itself, wouldn't those expressions represent alternate possibilities or realities--what time would look like if different choices were made or different situations were present?"

    followed by bringing up Dragon Breaks in connection with it a paragraph later, that made us think that's what you wre saying.

     

     

    Okay, I have a question. I understand and agree with the concept of the ongoing struggle between Lorkhan/Shor and Auri'El. However, I hope I understand your point about Alduin correctly.  You said, [Alduin] keeps fucking up Shor's plans whether they know that's the reason or not. I understood this to mean that Alduin is Auri'El's reset button (my logic is that he's fucking up Shor, so he could not be from Shor).  If, then, Alduin is Auri'El's "reset" button, does Alduin's appearance mean that Lorkhan/Shor is winning; thus, the need for Auri'El to reset the fight? If true, how does that square with current events where it appears that Lorkhan/Shor is not winning, i.e., removal of Man's dominance (the decline of the Empire), the removal of Talos worship, the rise of Elven dominance, etc.?

     

    I don't think Alduin was made by Auri'El as a reset. I think Alduin is the Nordic mythopea of Auri'El, or rather, both Alduin and Auri'El are aspects of the Time diety Aka. They represent a force the Nords hate regardless of their relationship.

    Actually, I think this concept I'm attempting to explain is easier to understand this way; men looked at this Time God and saw a demon, an evil creature that wanted to end the world, elves looked at this Time God and saw a god-king who would lead them to salvation. The nature of existence means they're both right, and this Time diety was fractured into Auri'El and Alduin. When the Alessians made Akatosh, they re-merged parts of these two aspects, creating a third fracture (though I'm certain there are more). When you do this for every race for every Spirit, and you end up with as many gods as there are people. And when the nature of existence is thought, thoughts can change these things if they're powerless to stop it. That's why Men and Elves can look at the "same" god, and both be correct.

    Now to reset buttons and who's winning/losing. Auri'El didn't/doesn't send Alduin. Auri'El is an elven god-king. Alduin comes when Fate decides, he's powerless against it. Heroes are the only beings not bound by Fate. Now, this current Kalpa does seem to be someone's favorite. Whether it's Akatosh or Lorkhan intervening, I don't know, but the LDB was sent to post-pone the End Times.

    The dominion of Man isn't a winning condition for Lorkhan either. Lorkhan wants the world to exist untl someone achieves Amaranth. So far an Elf and a Man have gotten as far as CHIM, but one never attempted Amaranth, and the other would not reach it. Men are only the greatest beleivers in Lorkhan's idea behind Mundus. Mankind could be wiped out and Lorkhan would "win" so long as an elf achieves what he could not. The "Truth" Boethiah told the Chimer after deficating Malacath, related to Lorkhan and his plans for Mundus. That's why the Dunmer view Mundus as a test for the next life, and don't resent mortal existence like some other elves.

    But Men are the ones who keep fighting elves who want to end things. That's why Shezzarines keep popping up to help. It's literally Lorkhan's spirit giving Mankind a hand when it's desperately needed.