Elder Scrolls Lore » Discussions


Mauloch/Malacath/Trinimac?

  • Member
    January 14, 2016

    I think that is something you and Karves can work out if you speak privately. I wouldn't want to step on his toes and say go for it if the overlap between your topics is pretty big, however any new content in this group is a win-win for me  So if you both think that it is specific enough that these two threads can run in conjunction then go for it!

  • January 14, 2016

    "Don´t step on Orc´s toes, otherwise he might step on your head!"

    It´s up to Veloth, really. If the Pilgrim thinks it´s worth it´s own discussion, then yeah. I wouldn´t mind it here though, it´s Orc related after all. Well, maybe. I can´t be really sure, I haven´t seen it yet

  • Member
    January 14, 2016

    I don't think it's that odd. Shor's father (who is actually future version of himself) knows what's going to happen, knows the future, unlike Shor who sees only "his own standing", what is now. The same situation is with Auri-El and Trinimac. Auri-El sees the "above", the future, and Shor sees "below", the past. That speaks a lot, doesn't it?

    Interesting interpretation. I figured that was referencing the elven ideology vs the human ideology, that Ald looks up at Aetherius while Shor looks down to  Mundus. Which is better? They both have their preferences.

    If I'm right and Arkay=Tsun by the way, there's quite an obvious connection between him and Lorkhan. So I'm not dismissing Arkay anywhere, I just want to determine where exactly he stands)

    I'll try and put my thoughts down in a separate reply because this tree is getting confusing. It is just my interpretation so don't go quoting me. Mainly spit-balling but the idea is floating around.

    The two other questions that really nag me in this story though are why no one should speak to Jhunal and who is that scribe who hasn't written anything yet?))

    The scribe is a metaphor. "for under us is only a prologue, and under that still is only a scribe that hasn't written anything yet" Is saying there is a beginning but the rest is to be determined. "for above us is only an ending, and above that still is only a scribe that hasn't written anything yet." Is the ending. The book is about the kalpic cycle and Convention marks the beginning and end of the story. What happens in between is yet to be determined, as said here: "Yes, and always they will be ignored. As for the counsel you crave, bold son, and in spite of all your other fathers here with me, that you create every time you spit out your doom, do not worry. You have again beat the drum of war, and perhaps this time you will win." Shor son of Shor returned then to us on the mountaintop.

    About Jhunal. You know, I've never even picked up on that before. Well spotted  It could be a reference to Jhunal falling out of favour in the pantheon of the Nords. In this instance he advised a retreat and that may have been his death knell. What is interesting is that it is Dibella who still shows respect for him. Dibella has been closely linked with Jhunal but the exact nature is still to be determined. There's a missing link which no amount of AMAs or LMAs will address?

    What do you think about the Jhunal thing?

  • Member
    January 14, 2016

    So how do we get from Arkay to Trinimac to Malacath? How can one of the Eight Aedra become a Daedra? surely the elven words break down at that point?

    Below is a brief summary of my understanding of how they are connected in the sources:

    The implication is that Trinimac is the elven counterpart to Tsun, Stuhn and Arkay = TRInimac. It breaks down as follows:

    It's convoluted as fuck but Tu'whacca, Arkay, Xarxes asserts that Arkay is a fusion of Xarxes and Orkey.

    In turn "Orkey combines aspects of Mauloch and Arkay" (varieties of faith)

    We know that Mauloch and Malakath are likely the same oversoul.

    We know the connection between Malacath and Trinimac.

    Shor, Son of Shor says that Tsun and Stuhn shift with each other and Trinimac as you point out. See it is Tsun grabbing Dibella's hair yet an instant later it is Stuhn dragging her to a tent, then later it is Trinimac leaving the tent.

    So Trinimac = Stuhn, Tsun and Arkay.

    Arkay is also the Eye of the Thief, his planet is part of that constellation. The Thief's role is that of the rebel, he will always try to take the Tower (St Alessia was born under the sign of the Thief). In elven mythology the King (the Warrior of the enantiomorph) is Auriel.

    Lissette raised a good point in another thread: Trinimac in Varieties of Faith is described as a "Strong god of the early Aldmer, in some places more popular than Auri-El." That sounds like the Thief trying to take the Tower. Maybe not intentionally but certainly mythically if the number of worshippers equals divine power.

    Wait, what about Arkay? Trinimac, like Tsun, was a warrior's god. Honour, courage, strength and death were his sphere. Wouldn't an Aldmeri warrior pray to Trinimac for courage against death, or too help him deal out death? Not exactly the like the Inmperial Arkay we are used to but Trinimac is an elven god and their pantheon lacks a god of death. Xarxes fulfils the role to some degree:

    For the Altmer, Xarxes records not just the life stories of individual Elves, but all the connections of lineage and heritance that bind them together and link them to their ancestors. As nothing is more important to an Altmer than his or her ancestry, it is easy to understand Xarxes' paramount role in defining and maintaining status and stability in Summerset society.

    However it is a far cry from Arkay:

    He is the god of burials and funeral rites, and is sometimes associated with the seasons.

    That seasons thing is interesting. Have you seen his symbol? There is an interesting parallel between Trinimac and Arkay:

    Arkay is often more important in those cultures where his father, Akatosh, is either less related to time or where his time aspects are difficult to comprehend by the layman.

    Sounds a bit like the claim of Trinimac being more important than Auriel in some places, doesn't it?

    In TES nothing is ever easy. One cannot simply () compare deities between cultures and get an exact match, but I think Xarxes and Trinimac share the same oversoul which combines to be one of the Eight spokes.

    Now this is where scholarly work ends and conjecture begins. In Shor, Son of Shor there is an interesting piece of dialogue repeated on both sides. On Ald's side it is Trinimac who is compared to Tsun. On Shor's side it is Shor who is compared to Ald:

    Ald's shield thane Trinimac shook his head at this, for he was akin to Tsun and did not care much for logic-talk as much as he did only for his own standing....

    But Shor shook his head at this, for he was akin to Ald and did not care much for logic-talk as much as he did only for his own standing.

    We know Ald is akin to Shor. Akatosh is akin to Shezarr and Auriel is akin to Lorkhan because they're brothers. Yet why does Trinimac get to say the exact same lines as Shor? I think that the text is implying they're all (Trinimac, Shor, Tsun and Akatosh) akin to each other and that's why they get the same dialogue - it's the same person speaking in each clan, the only difference is the person speaking is the mythopoeic version for each side.

    The idea that Trinimac is akin to Akatosh actually makes sense if we look at Arkay's relationship to The Time Dragon:

    Arkay is often more important in those cultures where his father, Akatosh, is either less related to time or where his time aspects are difficult to comprehend by the layman.

    Does this make sense so far? So Akatosh is Arkay's dad. Lorkhan is Akatosh's brother. Kinship.

    Maybe that combination makes up the Altmeri pantheon verison of Arkay. If Xarxes is funerary rites and ancestral lists, Trinimac is the bringer of death, then the cycle of time and seasons is Auriel.

    Enter Shor: Whenever Lorkhan appears in myths it always ends in tragedy for him. It's his story no matter what culture you look at it from. Yet we have already looked at how Lorkhan can be akin to Trinimac so if Shor get's his heart ripped out by Trinimac (the Thief taking the Tower) how could that not effect Trinimac? Well, it did effect him. On a lower subgradient Trinimac undergoes his own transformation and becomes Malacath. His heart is ripped out and rage, vengeance and bitterness fills that void.

    Bringing that back to Lissette's theory, this enantiomorphic event is enough for Auri-El to ascend to heaven. This is very neat because it shows the enantiomorph working on multiple gradients: Auriel, Trinimac and Shor (The Warrior, The Mage and The Thief) and also Trinimac, Boethiah and Mephala (The Lover, The Shadow and The Tower).

    For all that to even make sense it is necessary to disregard any notion of Aedra and Daedra in the elven sense and embrace a concept of mythopoeia.

  • January 14, 2016

    Ald looks up at Aetherius while Shor looks down to  Mundus. Which is better? They both have their preferences.

    The funny thing, I think, is that every one who asks "which is better?" falls into exactly the same trap Shor and Ald are in) There is no "better" for each one is meaningless without the other. No point in looking into the past if you see no future. Life in Mundus is a path to Aetherius. One must descend with the purpose to ascend. Another funny thing is that coinsidetially, this (two arrows, down and up) is a symbol of the Thalmor, hehe)))

    The scribe is a metaphor.

    I have a feeling there's more) See, the scribe is between the end and the beginning. Then you said this:

    The truth lies where exactly?

    And I told you this:

    It's usually there where the God's story hasn't yet begun and the farmer's and the dog's has already ended.

    And there's exactly where this mysterious scribe is, isn't that curious?))

    About Jhunal. You know, I've never even picked up on that before.

    Hmm, really? This is in fact the first thing that caught my eye in the book))

    *goes and reads about Jhunal* .... Whoa! 

    From UESP:

    Julianos says: Know the truth. Observe the law. When in doubt, seek wisdom from the wise


    Maybe I'm a prejudiced Thalmor, but I can't be the only one seeing that people in Skyrim have issues with this...

    Then:

    JulianosAedric God of Wisdom and Logic, is one of the Cyrodilic Divines, governing the realms of literature, law, history, and contradiction. He is usually associated withmagic, and thus is often revered by wizards. Jhunal, the Nordic father of language and mathematics, fell out of favor in the Nordic pantheon, after which he became Julianos of the Divines. Monastic orders founded by Tiber Septim and dedicated to Julianos are the keepers of the Elder Scrolls.


    I suspect there's also some connection between Julianos and Magnus, which, in the context of the whole Mnemoli, Dragon Breaks and fate business, speak a lot...

  • January 14, 2016

    You know what's interesting about Trinimac and Shor being the same person? The fact that Trinimac "cut the shame from his soul" mimicking the idea of Shor cutting his own heart out. 

  • January 14, 2016

    Phil, this is really too much for simple Orc like myself. It think it´s time for me to reposition. Yes, reposition, because Orcs never retreat.

  • January 14, 2016
    In TES nothing is ever easy. One cannot simply () compare deities between cultures and get an exact match, but I think Xarxes and Trinimac share the same oversoul which combines to be one of the Eight spokes.

    Oh, and if you also add Stendarr to this mix... Since, as you said,

    Trinimac = Stuhn, Tsun and Arkay.

    And there I was saying that Tsun probably is Arkay...

    Also, if Xarxes is from this bunch as well, then we can glimpse someone's tentacles lurking nearby)))

  • Member
    January 15, 2016

    The funny thing, I think, is that every one who asks "which is better?" falls into exactly the same trap Shor and Ald are in) There is no "better" for each one is meaningless without the other. No point in looking into the past if you see no future. Life in Mundus is a path to Aetherius. One must descend with the purpose to ascend. Another funny thing is that coinsidetially, this (two arrows, down and up) is a symbol of the Thalmor, hehe)))

    I thought you were pro-dominion? The Thalmor most certainly share Ald's view that up is better. Sounds like you're becoming a Lorkhanite

    The scribe is a metaphor.

    I have a feeling there's more) See, the scribe is between the end and the beginning. Then you said this:

    The truth lies where exactly?

    And I told you this:

    It's usually there where the God's story hasn't yet begun and the farmer's and the dog's has already ended.

    And there's exactly where this mysterious scribe is, isn't that curious?))

    I'm not sure I follow this. The scribe is a metaphor for what hasn't happened yet. Ie, the scribe is the people of the current kalpa. The kalpa start at Convention and ends with a world eating, only for time to start again at Convention

    About Jhunal. You know, I've never even picked up on that before.

    Hmm, really? This is in fact the first thing that caught my eye in the book))

    *goes and reads about Jhunal* .... Whoa! 

    From UESP:

    Julianos says: Know the truth. Observe the law. When in doubt, seek wisdom from the wise


    Maybe I'm a prejudiced Thalmor, but I can't be the only one seeing that people in Skyrim have issues with this...

    Then:

    JulianosAedric God of Wisdom and Logic, is one of the Cyrodilic Divines, governing the realms of literature, law, history, and contradiction. He is usually associated withmagic, and thus is often revered by wizards. Jhunal, the Nordic father of language and mathematics, fell out of favor in the Nordic pantheon, after which he became Julianos of the Divines. Monastic orders founded by Tiber Septim and dedicated to Julianos are the keepers of the Elder Scrolls.


    I suspect there's also some connection between Julianos and Magnus, which, in the context of the whole Mnemoli, Dragon Breaks and fate business, speak a lot...

    Sounds like it's own separate discussion to me

  • Member
    January 15, 2016

    Absolutely. It's too coincidental to be coincidental in imo. I mentioned it here:

    Shor get's his heart ripped out by Trinimac (the Thief taking the Tower) how could that not effect Trinimac? Well, it did effect him. On a lower subgradient Trinimac undergoes his own transformation and becomes Malacath. His heart is ripped out and rage, vengeance and bitterness fills that void.