Forums » General Gaming

Help with this extremely important decision

    • 132 posts
    May 17, 2012 7:36 PM EDT

    Identical? Noooo brah. Battlefield is basically a combination of the good aspects of CoD and Halo, with a little bit of its own stuff. It has the vehicles (But better done IMO, it's actually possible for anyone to kill them, unlike Halo) and the large maps of Halo, and the weapons of health system of CoD.

    Everything is far more balanced, though. Guns are far more realistic in their accuracy, and it's still possible to survive being blindsided, unlike instadeath CoD. Literally nothing is overpowered, everything that was has been nerfed. There's no ridiculous Killstreaks that reward higher level players to be even more high level, everything is based on skill. It's pretty much the closest thing to a perfect FPS right now.

    • 952 posts
    May 17, 2012 7:38 PM EDT

    It still doesn't beat the Crysis series for me. But I guess Battlefied 3 is indeed better than MW3.

    • 60 posts
    May 17, 2012 7:38 PM EDT

    Dude, Battlefield 3 is a totally new level. It is far beyond halo, and call of duty. 

    • 60 posts
    May 17, 2012 7:38 PM EDT


    But BF3 is more funner than Crysis series IMHO depending if you play online or single player. Single player, crysis has a funner campaign, multiplayer, BF3 rapes.

    • 708 posts
    May 17, 2012 8:27 PM EDT

    Dude calm down each to their own, eh? COD is a different style to Battlefield even though they're both modern warfare shooters, and Halo is something different altogether.

    • 60 posts
    May 24, 2012 9:19 PM EDT

    If you think DD is awesome, you're going to love the redundant repetitiveness of killing each monster that comes at you the same way everytime.........