Roach or Roche? I´ve never guessed you´d be that type, Spooky
Sure, Witcher is more colorouful, but I think that Fallout 4 graphics seem more...detailed. Like a lot. That´s why I was worried at the beginning that my computer won´t handle it. So I started on Low. Then Medium. Still ok. High. Still ok. Ultra. Still bloody ok. Not a single lag so far (but loading screens are pain in the ass)
So, how´s that possible?
Roach is only my favourite demon-teleporting horse. Though really, why would I play the Witcher if it wasn't for the real MVP (Does he mean Ciri, Yen or Triss, the world will never know...Naturally I mean all 3 )
Personally I think the Witcher has way better graphics, though I haven't seen Fallout 4 first hand so I could be wrong.
Either way, the important thing here is that Fallout is like a 9/10, where the Witcher sits at about a 15/10 (the free DLC give it a 4 point boost )
And that gets us to the point that Fallout 4 should run on most PCs.
That rating is for graphics or game as whole? Fallout 4 sits on 8/10 for me right now. If I´ll raise it it all depends on if I´ll want to replay Fallout 4.
Witcher 3 has one huge advantage over Fallout 4. Story. So I guess we´ll see in few days how it will end. I have 14 hours in game and I´m not even sure if I´m nearing the end of the main story or not.
Well I'm the kind of person that my family got the PS3 when it first came out so my PS3 (which is still kicking it better than any XBOX 360 ever did) is one of those with the hardware issues, so I've kind've decided to kick back and wait a bit for sony to fix any PS4 Issues. I might even say" screw the PS4" and just buy a gaming CPU to hook up to one of my Family's TVs.
I have betrayed my discussion fully. Not only am I going to be getting Fallout 4, but I've finished Fallout 3 and will be downloading and playing New Vegas starting sometime next week. Ah well, gotta say now that I've played the earlier games on PC rather than Xbox 360, gotta say 3 at least is tonnes better on PC, just way less clunky.